Last updated: 20/10/2025
Spot fake container websites: a 5-minute check
How to spot legitimate vendors, benchmark prices realistically and pay safely with verified bank details.
We increasingly see very cheap offers and new shops that look trustworthy at first glance – sometimes even with a fresh company register entry. That is not automatically fraudulent, but risk rises when price, company details and payment route do not fit. Our aim is not blanket criticism but a fair, transparent check to help you stay safe.
Disclaimer: These checks improve confidence but don’t replace your own due diligence. Even if some signals look “green”, a vendor can still be unsafe. You decide and pay at your own risk; we accept no liability. Always combine checks with official registers, written quotes and verified bank details.
30-second quick check
- Realistic price/offer? Very low prices incl. crane delivery are rarely realistic.
- Company verifiable? Legal imprint, register entry, reachable phone and real address.
- Clean payment? CH-IBAN; account holder equals legal company name (incl. legal form).
- Badges clickable? Trust badges/payment logos must link to public verification pages.
- Domain vs. “years of experience”? Do claims match WHOIS/registry roughly?
- Public reviews? Credible Google/Trustpilot profiles?
Make sense of pricing
How to compare fairly
- Get several quotes; break down container, delivery, crane, VAT, realistic date.
- Crane: reach/height & waiting time; can a 40’ be unloaded on site?
- Outlier rule: >30–40% below the average ⇒ caution.
What carousels/price widgets rarely show
Always check the stock location (“Swiss terminal” vs. abroad). Locations explain big price gaps.
Why we show guide prices
Availability, colour, location, quality and FX change. Guide prices are transparent; fixed prices for common units. Delivery & crane are quoted individually.
Company & legal (official checks)
Identity
- Complete imprint (legal name, address, responsible person, UID).
- Registry entry exists and matches.
- Reachability: landline, office hours, proper IVR.
Address & footprint
- Check address on Maps (office? signage?).
- Organic footprint: profiles/posts/refs.
- Reviews: mixed & credible.
Evidence/documents
- Recent detailed photos of the actual container on request.
Payment & account (practical core test)
What must match
- IBAN country code “CH” for Swiss company.
- Account holder = legal company name.
- No obligation to Twint/crypto/card.
- Verify bank details by phone via an independent number.
How we work (K. SCHMIED AG)
- Private/smaller firms: prepayment.
- Long-term partners: invoice.
- Bank guarantee possible (fees shared fairly).
- Never pay to third-party/escrow accounts.
- We never send new bank details by email only – call us via the main number.
Domain/WHOIS & tech
WHOIS
- Domain age: brand-new + rock-bottom + prepay ⇒ risky.
- Check WHOIS (e.g. nic.ch).
- Wayback history exists? same industry?
E-Mail & SSL
- Email under own domain (e.g. @kschmied.ch).
- https is standard – name mismatch is suspicious.
Siegel-Pruefung
- Trusted Shops: Badge muss auf ein öffentliches Zertifikat verlinken.
- DNV/Bureau Veritas: Logos sind kein Shop-Gütesiegel.
- Payment logos matter only on the hosted checkout page.
Red flags & inconsistencies
Content inconsistencies
- “Years of experience” don’t match WHOIS/registry.
- No public reviews despite “long-standing”.
- Inconsistent imagery (watermarks, styles, weather).
Technical & trust signals
- Badges/logos not clickable or without external verification.
- Mixed currencies/languages, inconsistent VAT.
- Social icons without real profiles.
Fake-shop scanners (helpful – not proof)
Tools
Traffic-light ratings are indicative only; combine with registry/IBAN/WHOIS/price logic.
If a tool shows “green”, but…
- … price is clearly unrealistic
- … IBAN from abroad
- … account holder ≠ legal name
- … badges not clickable
- … “experience” vs WHOIS/registry mismatch
AI quick check (optional)
One prompt (short & clear)
How-to: Copy text → paste into an AI chat (e.g. ChatGPT, Copilot) → use the answer as an indication. Note: This page has no input field; no data is sent to us.
Please analyse this provider using generally accepted, indicative risk criteria for online container shops: [URL] Respond SHORT, CLEAR & STRUCTURED (max 10–12 lines): 1) RISK INDICATOR (non-definitive): 🟢 low / 🟠 medium / 🔴 elevated + 1 sentence explaining which indicators increase or reduce risk. 2) IDENTITY & CONTACT (verifiable indicators): - Do company name (imprint), domain and email domain logically match? - Is the listed phone number independently findable online (Google, business directories)? - Does the phone number exist outside the website itself? - Does its usage fit the company timeline (registry vs. claimed history)? - Is a legal entity named without an independent digital footprint? 3) HISTORY & PLAUSIBILITY: - Do claimed years of experience align with registry data, domain age (WHOIS) and Wayback history? - Is there a multi-year, verifiable digital trace? - Does the site appear new but claim long-standing experience? 4) PRICE & LOGIC CHECK (container-specific, indicative): - Compare with realistic container offers in Switzerland. - Additional plausibility check: Prices clearly below typical minimum market ranges for new or used containers indicate elevated risk, even without external comparison offers. - Especially critical: • very low fixed prices for new containers, • high-cube containers in rarely available sizes, • used high-cube containers at unusually low prices. - Flat nationwide transport pricing is uncommon in container logistics. - Transport and crane costs depend on distance and unloading conditions. - Are essential logistics questions asked? If not: risk signal. 5) PAYMENT & FORMAL DATA: - Do legal name, registry data and account holder match exactly? - Swiss company → CH-IBAN? - No forced crypto, prepaid or unusual payment methods? - Trust badges only if externally verifiable. 6) EXTERNAL FOOTPRINT: - Independent public reviews or profiles? - Internal testimonials alone are not a reliable signal. - Real social profiles with history or empty placeholders? 7) SUMMARY – KEY RISK INDICATORS: • Implausible pricing or logistics assumptions • Inconsistent identity, contact or payment data • Timeline conflicts (experience vs. domain/registry) 8) RECOMMENDED ACTION: “Do not pay until …” OR “Proceed only if the following proof is provided: …” (1–2 items) DISCLAIMER: Indicative assessment based on public criteria only. Not a factual determination. Always verify via official registers, comparison quotes and verified bank details.
Typical scam patterns (brief)
No logins/bank details via email links. Confirm bank details by phone via independently researched number.
Crypto/prepaid/unusual gateways or many small amounts – avoid.
«Only today», «Last 2 units»…
If only ads are visible and almost no organic footprint, scrutinise.
Specs widersprüchlich, gemischte Währungen/Sprachen.
Registry traces, CH-IBAN & proper holder, reachable phone, transparent totals.
Full checklist (at a glance)
Identity
- Complete imprint/legals
- Registry entry present
- Address plausible (maps/directory)
- Phone reachable (proper IVR)
- “Experience” vs WHOIS/registry?
Payment
- CH-IBAN
- Account holder = legal name
- No obligation to Twint/crypto/card
- Confirm bank details by phone
Price & delivery
- Compare several quotes (mind locations)
- Delivery & crane specified
- > 30–40 % = caution
- 40’ unloadable on site?
- Trust-/Zahlungs-Siegel verifizierbar
Domain & Historie
- WHOIS/Alter plausibel
- Wayback-Historie
- E-Mail unter eigener Domain
- Öffentliche Rezensionen vorhanden
Tools
- Fakeshop-Finder / Trusted-Shops
- KI-Schnellcheck
How to recognise us
- Since 1979 – AG seit 1984 (SZ).
- Payment only to CH-IBAN, account holder = legal name.
- Real office (not a depot) – by appointment.
- ZEFIX · HR-Auszug · Google-Bewertungen · LinkedIn
- Delivery with Swiss carriers – crane on request.
– Official registry entry · consistent contact data · real delivery photos in Switzerland